Introduction to peer review
What is peer review?
Peer review is the system used to assess the quality of a manuscript before it is published. Independent researchers in the relevant research area assess submitted manuscripts for originality, validity and significance to help editors determine whether a manuscript should be published in their journal.
How does it work?
When a manuscript is submitted to a journal, it is assessed to see if it meets the criteria for submission. If it does, the editorial team will select potential peer reviewers within the field of research to peer-review the manuscript and make recommendations.
There are three main types of peer review used by NJE:
Single-blind: the reviewers know the names of the authors, but the authors do not know who reviewed their manuscript unless the reviewer chooses to sign their report.
Double-blind: the reviewers do not know the names of the authors, and the authors do not know who reviewed their manuscript.
Open peer: authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article.
Different journals use different types of peer review. You can find out which peer-review system is used by a particular journal on their website
Why do peer review?
Peer review is an integral part of scientific publishing that confirms the validity of the manuscript. Peer reviewers are experts who volunteer their time to help improve the manuscripts they review. By undergoing peer review, manuscripts should become:
More robust – peer reviewers may point out gaps in a paper that require more explanation or additional experiments.
Easier to read – if parts of your paper are difficult to understand, reviewers can suggest changes.
More useful – peer reviewers also consider the importance of your paper to others in your field.
How peer review works
The peer review process can be single-blind, double-blind or open.
N. B. This diagram is a representation of the peer review process, and should not be taken as the definitive approach used by every journal.